Supporting technical capability

Find the manual processes worth automating with Power Automate.

Map the steps, handoffs and time spent on your manual processes. We estimate the benefit of automation and prepare a defined Power Automate build scope and quote.

Illustrative sample · supporting capability

Does retry resume the failed step without repeating completed work?

CONSTRUCTED EXAMPLETechnical record
Local workflow demonstration · mailbox failure
Observation
The sample account step completes; the mailbox step fails and later actions are held.
Decision
Keep the completed state and require an explicit retry.
Next action
Open the demonstration, inject a mailbox failure and inspect the generated event record after retry.

This capability can inform the next service. Its inclusion, price and calendar must be agreed in that service’s scope; following the link does not make it included.

Explore the relevant next service

Interactive sandbox / Employee lifecycle

One request.
A workspace ready for what’s next.

Set up a new colleague or close access when someone leaves. Approve the plan, run it and inspect what changed.

Ready to try

Local demonstration · fictional records, fixed rules and no live connections. Switching examples or reloading resets the workspace.

  1. Request
  2. Review & approve
  3. Apply & check
  4. Handover

02 / Change plan

A request becomes specific actions.

Start with the sample request.
The plan will name each system, the change and the result to check.

AccountAccessMailboxIT task

03 / Sample workspace

See the records change.

Local sandbox

User directory

No account

No sessions

Groups & workspace

No memberships

No access

Email service

Not provisioned

Sample record · no live connection

IT work queue

No task

Physical device work is handled by IT

What a live build includes

Real integrations, verified access, agreed retention rules, durable run history and tested alerts. You receive the workflow, acceptance results and an owner walkthrough. AI is added where interpreting a request helps; access changes still follow approved rules. Hosting, permissions and support are agreed for the actual scope.

Technical context

When this work applies

  • Employees waste hours each week emailing spreadsheets for approvals.
  • People do double data-entry between different Microsoft applications.
  • Manual handoffs cause delays, errors, and things falling through the cracks.

Possible outputs

Outputs to agree in scope

Automated Process Runbook

Each candidate process mapped, with the rules and the recommended flow.

Hours-saved ROI map

The manual effort each automation removes, quantified so the win is measurable.

A fixed build quote

The scoped, fixed price to build and deploy the recommended flows. The runbook is yours either way, so you can hand it to your own team or another vendor.

Commercial & delivery basis

The scope and conditions of the work.

Delivery window

This supporting capability has no separate confirmed delivery window. The proposal names its scope and calendar.

How engagements are scoped
Capability scope to confirm
  • Process mapping and automation opportunities
  • Recommended Power Automate flows
  • Hours-saved ROI map
  • A fixed-fee build quote
Scope assumptions
  • Standard Microsoft 365 and Power Automate licensing
Exclusions
  • Building and deploying the flows (a separate fixed quote from this assessment)
  • Premium connectors or custom code
Required access
  • Access to the apps and data the processes touch
  • A walkthrough of the current manual processes
  • A 30-minute kickoff with the process owner

Acceptance

The agreed completion standard.

The engagement is complete when the process runbook, ROI map, and the fixed build quote are delivered and reviewed.

Discuss the work

Tell us what you need to change.

Share the systems involved, why the change is needed and your deadline. We clarify the work, responsibilities and information needed for a proposal.

Discuss this project