For technology partners

Take on the client project without stretching your bench.

  • You keep the client and the project management.
  • We carry a defined piece of the technical work, agreed in writing with checks before handover.
  • Your client keeps a System guide they can run without us.

Project work only. No help desk, no on-call.

Delivered on Microsoft 365, Azure and the systems your clients already use.

Your organization

Client relationship.
Project management.

AZ Innovations

Hands-on delivery.
Defined technical scope.

Your client

Checks before handover.
A System guide they keep.

White-label or joint delivery, agreed in writing.

Illustrative partner sequence · file migration handover

One migration, clear decisions at each handoff.

Constructed sequence. Responsibilities and work windows are agreed for each project.

  1. 01MSP to AZ

    The MSP supplies the source inventory, the pilot users and the acceptance task. The MSP owns the client relationship.

  2. 02AZ to MSP

    AZ moves the pilot group, compares original and migrated files and records the exceptions. A failed comparison holds the next wave.

  3. 03Client to MSP

    The client pilot user checks their files and access. The client approves the next wave or records an exception.

  4. 04AZ to MSP owner

    The System guide, comparison scripts, check results and the open-exception list return to the MSP operating owner.

Illustrative sample · constructed example

A path exception needs an action, not a green total.

Reconciliation excerpt · constructed project folder

Selected check

Has the path exception been corrected and the destination checked?

File transfer / exception recordIllustrative
File transfer / exception record: constructed inspection record
RecordEvidence or responsibilitySample review
Source itemProjects / Sample project / Drawing register.pdfPath exception open
DestinationSharePoint / Projects / Drawing register.pdfTransfer awaiting correction
AccessProject member allowed; unrelated pilot user denied.Test pending
Existing linksKeep the old-to-new path and links needing an update.Owner review required

This is one constructed item. No total migrated, success percentage or client file is represented.

Evidence
The source path needs an approved technical rename before transfer.
Decision
Keep the exception open
Next action
Owner approves the rename and identifies links that need updating.

Constructed row using the documented reconciliation method. It is not a recovered client file or an aggregate success rate.

Where we contribute

Choose the part of the project you need delivered.

Review, plan or deliver. Each is agreed and priced on its own, so a plan is never mistaken for an implementation.

Before a commitment

Know the answer before you quote the client

Review the proposed design, migration scope, connected systems and cost assumptions before you quote the client project.

Across a complex transition

A change plan your client can sign off

Establish how identities, data, messaging and infrastructure will change, what must remain available and what will show readiness.

Within an agreed program

The technical piece delivered inside your project plan

Deliver an agreed part of your Microsoft or infrastructure project within your approval process and scheduled work windows.

The partner agreement

Clear responsibilities protect the relationship.

An NDA precedes confidential client information. The statement of work sets out how technical responsibility, delivery decisions and client communications fit together.

01

Your client relationship

White-label or joint delivery is agreed before work starts. Client communications, branding and commercial ownership are explicit. The agreement records the non-solicitation commitment.

02

Named technical responsibility

A named AZ technical lead coordinates the agreed technical work with your project owner. Specialists, communication responsibilities and work windows are named before delivery.

03

Fixed scope and commercial terms

Deliverables, assumptions, exclusions, acceptance criteria and price are agreed in writing. A material change receives a written decision before affected work proceeds.

04

A record your team can use

Architecture decisions, test results, exceptions and runbooks are handed over in the agreed format. Communication and scheduled change windows are established at the outset.

How you know the work is good

Judge it by what you can inspect.

The method is written down, the sample records open and the demo can be broken on purpose. Read it the way your technical owner would.

How a project runs

A first conversation, free. An agreed scope with a named technical lead in the proposal. The price fixed in writing before we are given access. Checks before handover.

How we work
What is checked

Release checks, access test matrices and ownership maps. Constructed inspection records on the service pages show the standard before you buy.

See sample deliverables
What you keep

A System guide: what was agreed, what changed, what was tested and what remains open. With it, the scripts and check results behind the work.

Start a partner conversation

What does the client need you to resolve?

Describe the systems involved, the proposed change, the open questions and the deadline. Tell us which part of the work you need us to own.

You can describe the project without naming the client. Confidential details follow the NDA.

First conversation free. Scope and price in writing before any access.

Review selected work

You are requesting

MSP partner inquiry

All fields are required unless marked optional.

Include the client context, your role, the deadline, and the architectural responsibility you need.

What would a good result let your team do differently? Include a target date or a measurable improvement if you have one.

We review your systems, intended changes and deadline before proposing the work.

We’ll review your request and follow up about scope and next steps.

Do not submit passwords, credentials, or confidential client records through this form.