Does the business itself control its systems, contracts, access, and documentation, even through a provider change?

Restore ownership of the tenant, the licences, the documentation, and the decisions.

IT Ownership & Licensing

The environment is really owned by whoever set it up: an MSP on the way out, an administrator who left, a reseller holding the billing. Licences renew for staff who never sign in, the renewal quote arrives with no way to check it, and no document says what exists or who owns what.

What gets delivered

Ownership is verified and transferred, access is rotated, vendors and billing are reconciled, licensing is corrected against actual use before the renewal locks it in, and the environment is documented to a standard the next person can operate from.

What made you look today?

Common reasons this becomes urgent

The MSP, administrator, or reseller who holds the keys is leaving

Ownership is verified, access is rotated, vendors and billing are reconciled, and the documentation is accepted before the departure date.

A Microsoft renewal is approaching and the quote cannot be checked

Actual use and purchased quantities are reconciled, safe changes are made before the term locks, and finance receives a renewal order built from evidence.

Leadership inherited an environment nobody can explain

The estate is verified against the live tenant, every finding gets an owner and a severity, and the next action arrives priced.

How the work runs

Ownership, access, vendor relationships, licensing and documentation are verified against the live environment, and the transfer or correction is agreed as a fixed scope. Then: Access is rotated, ownership transferred, licence changes made where authorized, and the documentation handed over and accepted.

Where this is priced

Each engagement below carries its own fixed scope. The price is agreed before any work begins, and the fixed proposal contains the delivery calendar and the completion date.

Also delivered in this area, as custom projects

Work in this list is deliberately not packaged: the scope varies too much for one honest price. The route, the risks, the completion test and the fixed price are agreed before anything begins.

  • M&A Technology Readiness & Diligence
  • Architecture & Vendor Second Opinion
  • As-Built & Technical Handover
  • Architecture Oversight
  • White-Label Microsoft Project Delivery
  • MSP Architecture & Scope Review
Describe the situation →

The finished state

What is true when it is done

The business holds its own keys, every vendor relationship and licence line is accounted for, the renewal was decided on evidence, and the documentation matches what is actually running.

What you keep

Everything below is yours to keep whatever happens next, including handing it to your own team or another vendor.

  • The verified access and ownership register
  • The licensing position, line by line, against actual use
  • The vendor and billing reconciliation
  • The environment documentation, accepted at handover
  • The decision log for everything that changed hands

For the full commercial shape of work in this area — scope, price treatment, definition of done — see a representative engagement: Microsoft 365 Tenant Takeover & Vendor Handover.

What moves the price

The fee is set by what is actually in the environment; headcount is only one of the inputs.

  • Number of tenants, vendors and billing relationships
  • Licence volume and agreement type
  • State of existing documentation
  • How much access has to be rotated and verified

Describe what happened

A reply comes within one business day with the most direct next step, or a clear answer that AZ Innovations is not the right fit.

Talk Through the Problem →